expert witness header
spacer

Category Regulation Changes

Enforcing ELDs: A new way of life for trucking

Unknowns associated with the ELD mandate abound, but right now, enforcement issues are a top concern in the industry.

Roadside inspections

The electronic logging device (ELD) mandate is here, and there are still a lot of unknowns that go along with it. The industry is still waiting to see how the mandate will really impact capacity, rates, productivity, and, of course, the growing truck driver shortage.

However, since the mandate went into effect on Dec. 18, one of the larger known issues associated with it is enforcement officer training.

“The biggest problem we’ve seen at roadside is the training enforcement received is somewhat minimal if any,” Fred Fakkema, vice president of compliance for Zonar Systems, told Fleet Owner. “I think they’re still going through it. The issue today is when one of our legacy customers that are running AOBRDs (automatic onboard recording devices), which are grandfathered in until 2019, is being questioned as to why they don’t have an ELD and then are written up on the inspection report, if you will.”

Though enforcement officers are not putting truckers out of service for not having an ELD until April 1, they are still looking to see if drivers are indeed complying with the mandate. FMCSA has maintained that CSA points won’t go against the carrier right away, but officers are still making notes in their inspection reports.

According to Fakkema, who is a former 25-year veteran with the Washington State Patrol, the problem is that officers still don’t understand that grandfathered-in AOBRD truckers do not need to have an ELD – at least not until 2019.

“The driver needs to indicate to enforcement, ‘No, I’m not [using] an ELD; I’m [using] an AOBRD and I’m grandfathered in,’” he explained.

“Coming from the enforcement background, we know how important that first interaction is, how that should take place and what direction it will go if the driver accidentally says ‘ELD’ when he means ‘AOBRD,’” Fakkema added. “It’s really that communication piece on the roadside that’s so important.”

Holding out on ELDs

Through the month of December, Zonar saw a surge in ELD adoption rates, particularly among the smaller carriers trying to catch up with the mandate.

“A lot of them assumed that with CVSA’s announcement of the April 1 out-of-service criteria that we could wait until April, then they found out that that’s actually not the case,” Fakkema explained. “I think there’s a few of them that were hoping something would happen right before the deadline. They were hoping for a say and that hasn’t come to fruition.”

Though adoption rates were on the rise nearing the Dec. 18 deadline, many smaller carriers and owner-operators are still deciding to hold out until “hard enforcement” begins in April, according to Fakkema. It’s a trend others within the industry are seeing as well.

Kevin Hill, president and founder of CarrierLists, said that even a month before the mandate became law, two out of three smaller fleets had yet to install electronic devices. Among the smaller carriers he surveyed in the last two months, ELD adoption rates jumped to around 75%. However, adoption since has been flat, he noted.

“I think some of them are going to try to hold out,” Hill explained. “I think a lot of them had equipment on back order. I expect that once we get well into January, it will start rising again once they get their devices from back order.”

Hill pointed out that he believes many of those small fleets and owner-operators will indeed wait until April 1.

“Say 5% or 10% wait and still don’t have ELDs. If you take 5% of the trucks off the market, especially with capacity as it is right now, there will be exponential results on that,” he said.

According to DAT Solutions’ data for the week ending Dec. 30, van load-to-truck ratio was up 22% to 12.3 from 10.1 the previous week, and reefer load-to-truck ratio was up 33% to 23.7 from 17.8 the previous week. DAT analyst Mark Montague said those load-to-truck ratios are at record highs.

Because of the activity in the market and strong economic growth, Hill explained driver time is going to become much more valuable as we head further into 2018. That means the shippers who are inefficient loading or unloading and have chronic detention problems will see their costs rise more than their competitors in 2018, he said.

Hill also projects inefficient shippers will have two choices going forward: Pay higher-than-market rates, or invest capital to become more efficient in their production and shipping departments.

In addition, DAT’s Montague stressed that with load-to-truck ratios setting record highs, it is imperative shippers make their operations more driver friendly.

“I’ve been in drop lots where a driver has to spend a half hour hunting down his trailer,” Montague told Fleet Owner. “So there are a number of things shippers can do to make it more friendly for truck drivers and minimize their time spent at the facilities.”

For instance, Montague emphasized the need for solid communication between the receiving gate and the dock to minimize loading and unloading times. He also suggested shippers make their facilities more available to drivers taking their mandated breaks.

ELDs and the driver shortage

There has also been a lot of discussion about drivers leaving the industry because of the ELD mandate. However, as Montague pointed out, market rates are so strong right now that it’s “hard to envision a meaningful exodus of owner-operators in the industry.”

For those who haven’t yet installed an ELD, Montague noted that he believes there will be a lot of pressure to comply with the mandate before April 1.

“I think if the guys get a ticket, they are going to be convinced they are going to need to go out and get an ELD,” he explained. “If it gets back to the company the owner-operators drive for, that’s not going to sit well with the company because eventually it will impact the company’s insurance rates.”

Montague added that particularly knowledgeable shippers are pretty well-educated on the mandate at this point and that they have been requiring their carriers and brokers to hire drivers with ELDs.

“If you find out your load was delayed because the driver didn’t have an ELD and was stopped, that’s definitely going to be a huge negative,” he said.

As for training drivers and making them more comfortable with the idea of using an ELD, Fakkema suggests fleet managers leverage drivers who have already embraced the technology to help mentor more reluctant drivers.

“It’s hard to push something from the top down in any culture and in any business,” he explained. “It really has to come from the bottom up. If you have drivers who understand the technology, how it works, and how it benefits the driver and have those individuals work with the other drivers to really create that mind-set for others, that it is a good thing and not necessarily a bad thing.”

Fakkema further stressed that education is key for drivers when interacting with enforcement officers.

“That initial contact – when it’s just the driver and it’s just the enforcement person on the side of the road – I don’t think there’s enough focus placed on how that transaction takes place,” he noted. “That’s the important piece. That’s where it all happens.”

Excerpted from https://www.fleetowner.com/regulations/enforcing-elds-new-way-life-trucking

DVIR Elimination if No Defects Found

Yesterday, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration eliminated the regulation requiring commercial vehicle drivers to submit and retain Driver-Vehicle Inspection Reports when the driver has neither discovered nor been made aware of any vehicle defects.
The FMCSA found that the time saved by eliminating the paperwork required by the DVIR rule will relieve the trucking industry of 46.7 million working hours and save $1.7 billion per year. In addition, the FMSCA stated that eliminating the DVIR rule would not have any negative safety impacts because other regulations still require drivers to conduct pre-trip inspections.
The elimination of the DVIR requirement takes effect immediately, but is not eliminated for passenger-carrying commercial motor vehicles, such as busses.

BREAKING: 34-Hour Restart Rule Suspended

Excerpted from the Texas Trucking Association

TXTA Logo

The Unified Voice of Texas Trucking

December 17, 2014

34-Hour Restart suspension effective immediately

Late last night, President Barack Obama signed the $1.1 trillion spending bill passed by Congress that includes language to suspend the current 34-hour restart provision of the hours-of-service rule.

Obama’s signature means—effective immediately—the industry will return to the restart provision in place prior to the July 2013 changes; allowing a driver to take as many restarts as he or she chooses during a work week and does not require that a restart include two consecutive 1 a.m. to 5 a.m. time periods.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) is expected to prepare a notice for the Federal Register that will explain ramifications of Obama’s action with respect to commercial vehicle enforcement.

The Texas trucking industry and TXTA thank Congress, particularly Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), for the commonsense fix to these two unjustified provisions of the current hours-of-service restart rules in this year’s omnibus spending bill.

Thank you, also, to TXTA members for your help notifying our Congressional delegation. Your involvement made a difference and our voice has been heard!

Texas Trucking Association | 700 East 11th Street Austin, TX 78701 | (800) 727-7135

Off-Duty Authorization No Longer Required

Excerpted from regsense.com:

Off-Duty Authorization No Longer Required

Prior to the new hours-of-service rules that went into effect July 1, 2013, DOT Interpretation—§395.2, Question 2, listed four conditions that must be met for a driver of a CMV to record meal and other routine stops as off-duty time. One of those conditions was that, “If the driver has been relieved from duty, the duration of the relief from duty must have been made known to the driver prior to the driver’s departure in written instructions from the employer.”

This guidance, written April 4, 1997, was deemed by the FMCSA to be no longer necessary, as the language is “out-of-date and no longer provides practical assistance to motor carriers attempting to achieve compliance with the new HOS rules.” They also determined the language was overly restrictive and inconsistent with the new hours-of-service rules.

The new revision of regulatory guidance by the FMCSA became effective July 12, 2013. This guidance made it clear that the motor carrier does not have to issue formal instructions, verbal or written, to their drivers with regard to time and locations where rest breaks may be taken to be considered off duty.

The regulatory guidance for §395.2 now states the conditions for a driver to record meal and other routine stops, including a 30-minute rest break as off-duty time provided:

The driver is relieved of all duty and responsibility for the care and custody of the vehicle, its accessories, and any cargo or passengers it may be carrying.

During the stop, and for the duration of the stop, the driver must be at liberty to pursue activities of his/her own choosing.

This allows the driver to stop working and carry out their own personal interests or activities, irrespective of whether the driver has the ability to leave a location, and record this time as off duty.

Court Rules on HOS Cases

Excerpted from CVSA.org

On August 2nd, the US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has issued its rulings on the HOS challenges brought by the American Trucking Associations and the Advocates and Public Citizen. The Court combined the two challenges, which sought to overturn the new HOS rules, albeit, for opposite reasons.

In its ruling, the Court denied both challenges, with one exception – the ruling vacates the 30-minute rest break requirement for short haul truck drivers.

Basically, the rule change requires a 30 minute break after driving for 8 hours. The court decided the rule stands, but it will not apply to short-haul drivers, those that do not go further than a 100 air mile radius.


Motor Carriers Asked to Weigh in on 34-Hour Restart Changes

(An excerpt from the ARTI-online.org website)

Arlington, VA – The American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) today released a survey on the potential impacts of changes to the 34-hour restart rule. Under the new Hours-of-Service rules that are scheduled to take effect next year, changes to the 34-hour restart will include 1) a requirement that a restart include two periods between 1 a.m. – 5 a.m., and 2) a limitation of one restart per 7-day time period. This survey is part of a larger ATRI study quantifying real-world operational impacts on the trucking industry that may result from these revisions.

Motor carriers are encouraged to provide confidential input on the HOS changes through ATRI’s survey, available online at www.atri-online.org or by clicking here. The aggregated and anonymized results of the survey will be available later this year and ATRI’s full HOS study will be released in early 2013.

ATRI is the trucking industry’s 501(c)(3) not-for-profit research organization. It is engaged in critical research relating to freight transportation’s essential role in maintaining a safe, secure and efficient transportation system.

Changes made to on-duty/off-duty logging

New federal hours-of-service rules that were published in December officially took effect on February 27, 2012.

Though some of the most significant changes will not be implemented for another 16 months, motor carriers and their commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers were expected to comply with the following changes as of February 27, 2012:

  1. Time spent resting in a parked vehicle of any type, for any length of time, can now be logged as “off duty.” Previously, such time generally had to be recorded as “on duty.” Like other short periods of rest, this off-duty time will not stop the 14-hour clock for drivers of property-carrying CMVs. In addition, this option cannot be used by drivers who are required to attend explosive hazardous materials under 49 CFR Sec. 397.5.
  2. Up to 2 hours spent riding in the passenger seat of a moving, property-carrying CMV immediately before or after spending at least 8 consecutive hours in a sleeper berth can also be logged as “off duty” and will extend the 14-hour limit.
  3. Drivers who exceed the 10- or 11-hour driving limits by more than 3 hours — and carriers that allow them to do so — are now considered to have committed an “egregious” violation that could result in the maximum penalties allowed by law.
  4. Drivers who use the oilfield “waiting time” exception in Sec. 395.1(d)(2) must record their waiting time as “off duty” on a standard log and then add notes or use a fifth grid line to show which time was spent waiting. These drivers are not eligible for the 100-air-mile exception from the log requirements.

Beginning July 1, 2013, drivers of property-carrying CMVs will have to begin complying with new restrictions on use of the 34-hour restart option, as well as a new requirement for mandatory 30-minute breaks every 8 hours.

Drivers of passenger-carrying CMVs will not be affected by the 2013 changes.

-taken from JJKeller.com website

FMCSA bans hand held cell phones amongst truck drivers

11/23/2011

The Department of Transportation announced a final rule that will ban interstate truck and bus drivers from using hand-held cellphones while operating their vehicles.

The rule prohibits commercial drivers from using hand-held phones while driving a truck or bus, sets federal civil penalties of up to $2,750 for each offense and disqualifies drivers from operating a commercial motor vehicle after multiple offenses.

Commercial truck and bus companies that allow drivers to use hand-held cell phones while driving will face a penalty of up to $11,000. The rule will affect about four million commercial drivers, DOT said.

The rule was officially issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, both of which fall under the DOT umbrella.

Click here for the full report from the FMCSA


Expert Witnesses | Services | Computer Based Test Systems | Reference Information | FMCSR | Site Map

©2001-2024 Analysis, Inc., All Rights Reserved.

Colorado Web Development by Flexiss,LLC